/
/ 

Do Kwon: $40 billion in losses, $19 million forfeited

2026-09-28 · Illicit Finance Terraform Labs’ founder was sentenced to fifteen years for a fraud the Department of Justice values at over $40 billion in investor losses. The forfeiture ordered against him is a little over $19 million, which is about one twentieth of one percent…

01 / 01 Sections Sections

2026-09-28 · Illicit Finance

Terraform Labs’ founder was sentenced to fifteen years for a fraud the Department of Justice values at over $40 billion in investor losses. The forfeiture ordered against him is a little over $19 million, which is about one twentieth of one percent of the harm.

Key findings

  • Do Hyeong Kwon was sentenced to 15 years on 11 December 2025 by U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the Southern District of New York, after pleading guilty in August 2025.
  • Forfeiture is just over $19 million against more than $40 billion in stated investor losses, a recovery ratio of roughly 0.05%.
  • The algorithm never worked. The Department states that when TerraUSD lost its dollar peg in May 2021, the peg was restored only because a high-frequency trading firm bought millions of dollars of UST to prop it up, under an agreement with Kwon, who then publicly credited the algorithm.
  • The “real world usage” was copied in. Kwon claimed the Korean payment app Chai processed billions in transactions on the Terra blockchain. The Department states Chai used conventional payment networks, and an automated process copied the transactions onto Terra to create the appearance.
  • Two large numbers are not the same number. Over $40 billion is the stated investor loss. Over $50 billion is the peak combined market value of UST and LUNA in spring 2022.

Case file

Field Value
Matter United States v. Do Hyeong Kwon
Court S.D.N.Y., Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
Docket 23 Cr. 151 (PAE)
Arrested Montenegro, 23 March 2023, for attempting to use a fraudulent passport
Extradited 31 December 2024
Pleaded guilty August 2025
Convictions Wire fraud; conspiracy to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud and wire fraud
Sentenced 11 December 2025, 15 years
Forfeiture Over $19 million, including his interest in Terraform and its cryptocurrencies
Investor losses Over $40 billion
Peak market value, UST and LUNA Over $50 billion, spring 2022
Prosecutors U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton; AUSAs Marguerite B. Colson, Sarah Mortazavi, Kimberly Ravener
Posture as of 3 August 2026 Sentenced. Press release number 25-263

What the record shows

What was Kwon convicted of?

Do Hyeong Kwon, 34, of the Republic of Korea, was sentenced on 11 December 2025 to 15 years in prison for wire fraud and for conspiring to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud and wire fraud, in connection with Terraform Labs PTE, Ltd. and the cryptocurrencies it launched. [P] He was extradited on 31 December 2024 and pleaded guilty in August 2025 before U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, who imposed the sentence.

He was ordered to forfeit over $19 million in proceeds, including his interest in Terraform and its cryptocurrencies.

Kwon was arrested in Montenegro on 23 March 2023 for trying to use a fraudulent passport. [P]

What the Department says the fraud consisted of

The Department of Justice identifies five categories of misrepresentation, made between about 2018 and 2022.

The stablecoin misrepresentations. Terraform issued TerraUSD (UST), an algorithmic stablecoin that was supposed to hold a $1 value through the “Terra Protocol”, under which one UST could always be exchanged for $1 worth of LUNA and the reverse. Kwon and his associates advertised the protocol’s economic incentives as sufficient on their own to hold the peg. In May 2021 UST fell below 92 cents, and Kwon publicly claimed the protocol had restored the peg by itself. The Department states plainly: “That was a lie.” In truth Kwon had reached an agreement with executives at a high-frequency trading firm to buy large amounts of UST, and the peg was restored only after that firm “strategically purchased millions of dollars of UST for the purpose of artificially propping up the peg.”

The LFG misrepresentations. Kwon announced the Luna Foundation Guard in about January 2022 as an independent body governing billions of dollars of reserves to defend the peg. The Department states he controlled both the LFG and Terraform throughout, operated the LFG as an arm of Terraform, made significant financial decisions without its governing body’s prior approval, treated its funds as interchangeable with Terraform’s, and misappropriated hundreds of millions of dollars in assets from it, which he and others then sought to launder.

The Mirror misrepresentations. Mirror Protocol allowed the creation and trading of synthetic versions of U.S.-listed stocks. Kwon said it operated in a decentralized manner and that he and Terraform had no role in its governance. The Department states they secretly retained control and used automated trading bots to manipulate the prices of Mirror’s synthetic assets, funded in part by one billion stablecoins created at the genesis of the Terra blockchain. Terraform also inflated user metrics to deceive investors about Mirror’s adoption.

The Chai misrepresentations. Kwon claimed the Korean payment application Chai processed billions of dollars of transactions on the Terra blockchain, presenting this as evidence of real world use distinguishing Terra from competitors. The Department states Chai processed transactions through traditional payment networks, and that Kwon and co-conspirators used an automated process that copied transactions onto the Terra blockchain to create the illusion. [P]

The genesis coin misrepresentations. Approximately one billion Terra stablecoins existed at the blockchain’s establishment in about 2019. The Department states Kwon gave limited, shifting and knowingly false disclosures about them, and used them to fund the fake Chai transactions and the Mirror trading bots.

The collapse

At its peak in spring 2022 the combined market value of UST and LUNA exceeded $50 billion. [P] By May 2022 the UST market was roughly nine times larger by market capitalization and more than eight times larger by daily trading volume than a year earlier, when Kwon had covered the 2021 depeg by arrangement. The Department states he was unable to do so again at that scale. UST and LUNA crashed, “resulting in over $40 billion worth in investor losses.”

What he said afterward

After the crash, Kwon publicly described himself as being in “full cooperation” with law enforcement. The Department quotes a recorded conversation with an associate from about August 2022 in which Kwon said, in substance and in part, that his strategy toward the investigators was to “tell them to fuck off”, that he had been taking steps to obtain “political protection” from multiple countries, and that he was “pretty comfortable” he would not be extradited.

U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said Kwon “embarked on a deceptive public relations campaign to cover up his fraud, laundered the proceeds of his illegal schemes, and sought to purchase political protection in foreign countries to evade criminal prosecution.”

Cite as: Max Avery, “Do Kwon: $40 billion in losses, $19 million forfeited”, maxavery.org, 28 September 2026. Primary source: U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, press release 25-263, 11 December 2025.

What I think is going on

The number I cannot get past is the forfeiture. Over $40 billion in investor losses, and just over $19 million forfeited. For every thousand dollars somebody lost, the government recovered about fifty cents.

That is not a criticism of the prosecutors, who cannot forfeit what is not there. It is a fact about what this kind of fraud does with money. Kwon was not running a Ponzi scheme where deposits arrive and get spent. He was running a machine that manufactured market capitalization, and market capitalization is not a pot of money that somebody walks off with. The $40 billion was never in one place. It existed as the price of a token multiplied by the number of tokens, and when the price went to zero the value did not move to a wallet in Montenegro. It stopped existing.

Anyone reasoning about crypto losses should keep that distinction. When an exchange fails, there is usually an estate, and the fight is over who ranks where in it. When a token collapses, there is frequently nothing to fight over. Fifteen years is what the state can offer instead of your money back, and for most Terra investors it is all they are going to get.

The second thing worth extracting is the Chai fraud, which I think is the most instructive item on the list and gets the least attention. Kwon’s problem was that Terra needed to look used. Adoption was the whole pitch. So, on the Department’s account, transactions that a Korean payment company processed through ordinary payment rails were copied onto the Terra blockchain by an automated process, so that observers looking at the chain would see the volume.

Sit with the implication. On-chain data was widely treated as the one thing that could not be faked, the honest ledger underneath the marketing. Here it was the marketing. Anybody in 2021 who checked Terra’s transaction counts as a sanity test against Kwon’s claims found exactly what Kwon wanted them to find, and the check felt like diligence. This is the same failure that shows up in the wash trading indictments, where volume was manufactured to order. A blockchain records what somebody wrote to it. It does not certify that the thing described actually happened somewhere else.

Third, the May 2021 depeg deserves more weight than it gets. The mechanism failed a year before it failed publicly. Kwon knew it could not hold on its own, because he had to arrange for a trading firm to buy the peg back, and he then told the market the algorithm had done it. Every person who bought UST between May 2021 and May 2022 did so on the strength of a stress test that had actually been failed and privately rescued. The 2022 collapse was not a black swan. It was the 2021 event at nine times the size, where the rescue was no longer affordable.

The bravado on the recorded call is the part that will get quoted, and it is genuinely extraordinary that a person under investigation in multiple countries said he intended to buy political protection and expected not to be extradited. He was extradited on the last day of 2024. But the profanity is not the story. The story is that a stablecoin was never stable, its main proof of adoption was copied in, and the entity supposedly guarding the reserves was the founder.

What reduces your exposure

Terra is a concentration failure, not a custody failure. No entity structure, trust or qualified custodian would have preserved a dollar of it, because the asset itself went to zero while sitting safely wherever it sat. Saying otherwise would be dishonest, and this article ends with no product attached.

What the case does support is narrower and worth stating.

A yield that is paid for by an incentive rather than by revenue is a countdown. Terra’s ecosystem paid roughly 20% on UST deposits. That was funded by the protocol, not by borrowers paying interest. When the subsidy has no external source, the question is not whether it stops but when, and the people holding at that moment absorb it.

Check the failure mode, not the mechanism. An algorithmic stablecoin holds its peg through a reflexive loop with its own volatile token. That design has a known failure mode where a falling peg mints more of the volatile token, which falls further, which breaks the peg further. This was described publicly before 2022 by people with no position. Understanding the failure mode was available; it just was not comfortable.

Treat on-chain metrics as claims that can be manufactured. Transaction counts, active addresses and volume are all writable by whoever wants them to look a certain way. Cross-check against something that costs real money to fake, such as audited revenue at a counterparty, or the counterparty confirming the relationship on its own account.

Size the position for a total loss. The specific lesson of a $40 billion collapse with a $19 million forfeiture is that there is no recovery mechanism at the end of this road. Not insolvency, not forfeiture, not restitution. The only protection against a token going to zero is having decided in advance how much of your balance sheet may go to zero.

None of these detect a sophisticated fraud, and Kwon’s held up against a lot of professional scrutiny for years. They change the size of the hole it leaves.

Sources

Disclosure. Max Avery is affiliated with Digital Ascension Group (DAG). Investment advisory services are offered through DAG Wealth, an SEC-registered investment adviser (CRD No. 328627). Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. DAG is not a law firm and does not provide legal or tax advice. Custody arrangements with third-party independent qualified custodians reduce certain risks but do not eliminate them. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. This article describes matters of public record; charges are allegations and defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

More from the journal

Continue reading.